Drop Fees “for the children”
Current Events vs. Founding Documents
Fox News/| Associated Press; May 27, 2012
Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) is urging airlines to allow families with young children to sit together without paying extra.
The New York Democrat is reacting to an Associated Press story last week detailing how families this summer are going to find it harder to sit together without paying fees that can add up to hundreds of dollars over the original ticket price.
“Children need access to their parents and parents need access to their children,” Schumer said in a statement. “Unnecessary airline fees shouldn’t serve as a literal barrier between mother and child.”
Since last year, American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Frontier Airlines and United Airlines have increased the percent of seats they set aside for elite frequent fliers or customers willing to pay extra. Fees for the seats — on the aisle, next to windows, or with more legroom — vary, but typically cost $25 extra, each way.
Schumer is asking Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood to issue rules preventing airlines from charging parents more to sit next to kids. He is also asking the industry’s trade group, Airlines for America, to persuade carriers to voluntarily waive the fee for families.
Airlines have resisted past efforts by the government to further regulate them. Their argument: The cost associated with new rules would cripple an industry already struggling with thin profit margins.
Senator Schumer and The Administrative State vs. The Constitution and The Airlines
The US Constitution, Amendment 10
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
We the People:
Who could object? After all, they would do it “for the children”. But Mr. Schumer wants an unelected administrative agency to exceed its constitutional authority by forcing different pricing policies upon private companies. Apparently this US Senator trusts government more than the people in the free market. Given the Tenth Amendment, do you think his statements are in line with his oath to uphold the Constitution?